Tuesday, August 5th, 2008

Vistatic first impressions

So I finally managed to get Vista installed last week, and have been using it a bit since then.
Now I know this might not be what you'd expect me to say.. but I think I prefer it over XP already. It's definitely an improvement in some ways!

The Start Menu has been hidden away, and replaced with some icons for commonly used items, plus a box to type in which will "do what you mean", a-la Sherlock and Quicksilver on the Mac, Tracker on GNOME(Linux) and Launchy on XP. FFS, finally! So that's a big win, IMO.

Next up, the user vs administrator separation. Sure, it does seem annoying that you have to stop and Authorise actions, but you know what? What is a good thing. I *like* knowing that run-away apps or naughty programs can't just sneak around modifying firewall rules or any old system files without my permission. You only need to do this authorisation stuff when you're installing new programs or modifying lower-level settings, so after your initial period of setup it doesn't get in the way. I'm not sure why there was such a fuss made about this. (Or maybe I'm just used to having to do it occasionally, having used *NIX and Macs before?)

I heard a lot of complaints about performance, but it doesn't seem too bad. Startup time is comparable to XP, possibly even slightly faster! General use, clicking menus, loading programs, etc seems fine too. Copying files, which I've heard gripes about, seemed to take longer to start copying than reasonable (ie. more than milliseconds) but wasn't what I would call delayed. The new File Explorer windows take some getting used to as they've changed the behaviour to be more like the Mac and Gnome UI, but still keeping aspects of the old way. I haven't made my mind up about whether it's easier or harder to use, yet.

So far I've only tested the in-game performance of Crysis.. at highest detail level, yeah, it ran a bit slow, ~15-20 fps with some hiccups.. but then, in highest detail, under XP, it also runs like a dog.. I think i lost about 5fps going to Vista, but keep in mind that under Vista it runs in "Ultra-high" detail, vs "High" in XP, and thus it's looking nicer in Vista in return for those FPS I lost. I'll need to test some other less stupidly-poorly-performing games too.
And probably buy some more RAM now I have an OS that can play games AND handle 4GB. :P
(Windows XP famously won't deal with more than 3GB of RAM)
But the complaint that Vista runs games at literally half the speed of XP doesn't seem justified.

Driver support: Well, my nVidia 8800GT and the Creative X-Fi were supported by 64bit vista drivers available from the manufacturers website, and nothing has crashed, so that seems alright. I'm afraid I don't have any exotic hardware in the gaming machine, so haven't got anything else to test! The various features provided by the motherboard (usb, network, etc) were all supported out of the box by Vista fine, and I wasn't surprised that my common USB devices also were supported.
I have a $3.00 USB MIDI adaptor winging it's way to me from the distant lands of China, via eBay, and that'll probably be more of a test :)

Software like DaemonTools worked just fine.

I haven't encountered any of the DRM that is meant to be under the surface, yet. But then, that would only apply if I used the machine for media (music, video, etc), rather than just gaming and surfing the web. (I still boot into Linux or Leopard for anything else!) However it does worry me that it's there.

Some gripes:
* Modal dialog windows are STILL not resizeable. Come on! Why not? What's wrong with making the "Save As" dialog box bigger than a postage stamp? On modern monitors, it's getting stupid.
* The default 'Off' button in the menu is actually Standby. You have to get into a little side-menu to get to the "Restart" and "Actually turn off damnit" options.
* Erm, it DID take me 5 attempts and a new hard drive to get it installed, although it was easy when it finally went on.
* I did note that Ableton Live (6.0.10) worked fine with DirectX input/output, but when I tried to use ASIO i/o everything went silent. I have no idea if that's Creative or Ableton's fault, but Live 6 is fairly old, and I had forgotten to switch the soundcard to 'Music production' mode. (The X-Fi is unique in having modes for Gaming, Music and Music production.)
* Windows still doesn't automatically pick up nearby printers. OSX and Gnome have been doing this for ages.

A note: All of this was tested on a recent copy of Vista (64 bit edition) with SP1 streamlined, and the latest drivers for my sound and video, on a high-end machine (Hitachi 500 GB SATA HDD, Core 2 Duo 2.88 GHz, 2 GB DDR800 RAM, 1GB ReadyBoost). I suspect this helps matters - I've heard from friends that SP1 made Vista usable, and that driver support was terrible initially, but decent now.. and I am running it on a moderately-well-specced machine.

Conclusion: I'm still going to continue to use Linux and MacOSX more than Vista, but all-in-all, I don't think Vista is as slow and unusable as its reputation. I don't see myself going back to XP.
On the other hand, it's interesting to see that the noticeable improvements have been blatantly nicked from its competitors, and nothing particularly interesting has been added beyond that.. and in return it's bloated out to using a huge amount of RAM and disk space.
(11 comments | Leave a comment)

Sunday, December 23rd, 2007

FAO: Graham, Robin & other gamers

Check out this bloke's reviews: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/editorials/zeropunctuation
(Thanks to Simeon for the heads-up)
(4 comments | Leave a comment)

Friday, November 17th, 2006

Nokia N93 review

So work has given me a couple of new Nokia phones to test out their web and photo capabilities. I now have a Nokia N73 and N93 on loan. The N73 seems alright, but the N93.. oh my god.. It's fricking huge! I don't know if you've seen my existing phone (HTC Magician), but it's not exactly small. However it's about half the weight of the N93, and looks like a wonder of minimalism next to the lumpy asymmetrical Nokia. Ugh.

The main selling point of the Nokia is that is has a 3 megapixel digital camera, with an actual zoom and tiny flash. A mobile phone that comes with a lens cap.. Who've thunk it?
However, the phone is about twice the size of modern digital cameras (which come with 6 to 8 MP), and is definitely inferior to them for photo quality. The sample model I received has an extremely finicky, nay, broken, data cable plug too. I have to put constant pressure on it to make a good enough connection to copy image files off it, which is hopeless.

So, given the Nokia is at least twice the size, and cost, of a small consumer digital camera.. would you really buy one just for the convenience of having to only carry one device?

My take on all this is from a "consumer journalism" perspective though, and for those purposes, it's probably not too bad.
But I just can't get over the sheer bulkiness of it! I just put it down next to my PSP, and it's not much smaller - but a hell of a lot chunkier.
(14 comments | Leave a comment)

Friday, September 23rd, 2005

Winter has already arrived for some..

OK, so Fahrenheit is messing with my head tonight.
Ritualistic serial killings in a freezing winter in NYC - seen from twi sides: A murderer, convinced he was forced to do it, as well as from the pair of detectives trying to solve the it all. Some cliches, and some interesting angles on the "interactive movie" techniques too. It reminds me of Max Payne, a little, only this one is centred around the plot unravelling, branching, twisting, whereas Max Payne concentrated on some (intentional) cliches and gunfights.
The difficulty doesn't seem too high - it isn't so much a puzzle or action game, but rather concentrates on giving you options, changing the way the story pans out depending on what, or how well, you did.

Graphically, it isn't quite as good as, say, the Source engine, and the physics are good but not great too - however it's still very good, and the scenes have been built very well, creating a good atmosphere. Pixel shader routines overlay movie grain to the image, and in flashback scenes there is an "old movie" effect.

Angelo Badalamenti (who I think was David Lynch's preferred composer?) has arranged the music; a lot of downbeat tracks that complement the characters' dispair as they fall. I like. I swear I heard Beth Gibbons singing in there somewhere too? (Anyone have the OST listing to check?)
(8 comments | Leave a comment)